top of page

Ph.D. Thesis Psychological collectivism and mental toughness in traditional wushu

Summary

stages-of-resesarch_orig.png

About

I would like to thank here all my informants and gate keepers, and my sifu, without you this project would never be possible. Thank you! 武术一个家

 

What is the experience of psychological collectivism in traditional wushu? What do the training communities look like? Is there any connection between psychological collectivism and mental toughness? And is that different for modern and traditional wushu?

The purpose of this mixed methods research (partially mixed sequential equal status design) was to investigate psychological collectivism and mental toughness in traditional wushu among young adult Europeans.  The study was proposed into two parts: First one is qualitative, exploring and grounding the phenomena of psychological collectivism and mental toughness in the qualitative data. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used, as a special tool to explore complexity and novelty. The second part made use of the quantitative approach to propose a model using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), namely the Multiple Indicator-Multiple Cause Model (MIMIC) and Multiple Group Model, when treating both groups of traditional wushu and modern wushu practitioners as two groups to compare their results in psychological collectivism and mental toughness.

Abstract

Wushu, Chinese martial art, consists of modern and traditional groups of styles. Previously it was researched that modern and traditional martial arts have different outcomes. Since traditional wushu is said to be rooted in Chinese values, its environment is a unique place to research psychological collectivism. Moreover, mental toughness is a new topic in the field of martial arts, and its connection with psychological collectivism was only researched on the society, not personality level. This study aimed to fill these gaps. This mixed methods research consisted of qualitative Study 1 and quantitative Study 2. Study 1 aimed to understand, what is the experience of psychological collectivism in traditional wushu training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight European adult participants of traditional wushu and were analyzed using the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In the Study 2, 277 European adult respondents (111 modern wushu and 166 traditional wushu practitioners) filled in the Sport Mental Toughness Questionnaire and Psychological Collectivism Questionnaire. To research the relationship of practicing modern or traditional wushu with psychological collectivism and mental toughness, several steps were done. First, the Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were run to test both models. Next, final model was tested using the Structural Equation Modelling. Model comparisons, path analysis and effects were completed. In the Study 1, five themes emerged from the data. The first one described how kung fu (traditional wushu) provided structure and direction for the interviewees. Also, it described them adapt better to the outer world and their ability to switch from being gentle to being ruthless. The second theme described perception of time. The third one explored kung fu community and provided a probe into the group identity and how the positioning closer to the master provided better learning option; the community served as the knowledge keeper. The third theme explored bridging gaps in communication. Finally, the fifth theme discovered seriousness of the practitioners, who had to endure mentally and physically torturous training. In Study 2, during the structural equation modeling the final model was confirmed as well as differences in the two groups of modern and traditional wushu. Moreover, it was found, that number of joined competitions or years of training did not result in a significant path with mental toughness, but perceived level of skill did. Relationship between psychological collectivism and mental toughness was found only in the traditional wushu group, however on a marginal p level. Psychological collectivism was explored in traditional wushu and helped to understand the structure and functioning of its community. The seriousness of its members served as a commodity, to ransom better position in the group. In the quantitative study, this seriousness seemed to be connected with the perceived level of skill. This variable resulted in the significant path with mental toughness. Therefore, it is suggested that social environment of the serious practitioners, who put themselves through demanding training, helped to develop mental toughness. This development is not based on the number of years in training, but rather on the way the practitioners perceive themselves.

Man in Blue Practicing Kung Fu

Kung Fu/ Traditional Wushu

is operationally defined as type of wushu (Chinese martial arts styles), an origin for modern wushu, with long history and bearing cultural and philosophical aspects of Chinese society (International Wushu Federation, n.d.). The purpose was originally self-defense (Liang, 2010) and particular systems are transited from master to students (Kennedy & Guo, 2005).

Man in Red Practicing Kung Fu

Modern Wushu

 is operationally defined as an exhibition and a full-contact sport derived from traditional wushu. Practitioners focus on two separate categories: taolu (routines) and sanda (fighting). Modern wushu is dated to 1949 and was developed to standardize the traditional wushu (European wushu kung fu federation, n.d.).

Support group

Psychological Collectivisn

 is operationally defined as the tendency to internalize norms of people's in-groups and being a member of one or more, a preference for consensus and solidarity, and understanding hierarchy and oneself as changeable in a stable environment; allocentrism (Triandis, 2001). It refers to a personality scale of collectivism, in so-called micro approach (Kim, Triandis, Kagitcibasi, Choi & Yoon, 1994).

Tough Guy

Mental Toughness

 is operationally defined as "unshakeable perseverance and conviction towards some goal despite pressure or adversity" (Middleton, Marsh, Martin, Richards and Perry, 2004, p. 6).

Participants

Martial artists from 27 countries joined this research!

Here are the visuals for the survey and for the interviews:

Results

results_1.png

Exploring psychological collectivism in traditional wushu, this research uncovers several themes that described the experience with self-orientation and its impacts, and thus answers the research question. In the qualitative part of this study, most importantly the group identity is described, as well as what it means to be a member of the training community. Furthermore, it is crucial to obtain a position in the group, which is as closer to its center as possible; this enables the practitioners to learn more on a deeper level. Their seriousness in learning serves as a commodity in the process of being accepted closer.

 

Next, this study describes control over the members. This may be as well an explanation for what is found in the quantitative part of the research: modern wushu practitioners scored higher on reliance, one of the dimensions of psychological collectivism, than traditional wushu. I suggest it is because in traditional wushu there is a hierarchical control and sometimes solidarity may be in fact provoked by this system of control. Moreover, the quantitative study enables testing the relationship of psychological collectivism and years spent in training. As a result, this was not the case. Therefore, I suggest that psychological collectivism is not developed with years of training. 

themes.jpg

This study also disproves that there is no relationship between psychological collectivism and mental toughness in traditional wushu. In modern wushu, however, no relationship was found. In traditional wushu, the relationship is shown but only marginal, and it needs to be confirmed with future studies and a bigger sample size. However, this is the first study to research psychological collectivism and also the first one to do so in the field of martial arts.
 
Psychological collectivism represents collectivism on personality, not societal level (Kim, Triandis, Kagitcibasi, Choi & Yoon, 1994). It emphasizes the situation as a key factor in collectivistic and individualistic behavior (Kim, Triandis, Kagitcibasi, Choi & Yoon, 1994; Triandis, 2001). With a correlation test, this research confirms that there is no relationship between psychological collectivism and the cultural background of the respondents’ wushu teacher.
Finally, mental toughness is confirmed by this study to be multi-dimensional. This model of mental toughness consists of three facets: constancy, control, and confidence. Furthermore, this study does not confirm that years of practice and competition experience influence mental toughness. This is a key finding. On the other hand, the perceived level of skill does. Moreover, I suggest that this quantitative variable, perceived skill level, is connected with the topic found in the qualitative study, seriousness. Seriousness serves as a commodity to gain a better position in the community. Practitioners, who are serious, undergo more demanding training. Those, who “survive”, are close to the teachers and each other, creating an in-group of survivors. I suggest that this environment may be crucial for developing mental toughness, thus this may be the explanation for the relationships between perceived skill level and mental toughness.

procedure_orig.jpg
model_orig.jpg
path_orig.jpg
bottom of page